tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24384544.post5497163168796722173..comments2023-05-08T20:53:29.394+10:00Comments on Development Answers (No Questions): Type coercion in JSTL - for sql:paramKevin Janszhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18251927796029491111noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24384544.post-55032005587810007892013-08-09T01:32:44.318+10:002013-08-09T01:32:44.318+10:00Also, this happened because of the removal of impl...Also, this happened because of the removal of implict casts in 8.3.<br /><br />http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-8-3.html#AEN124084<br /><br />See:<br /><br />http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2008/03/readding-implicit-casts-in-postgresql.htmlCraig Ringerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02343803844223399065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24384544.post-13741850346549860642013-08-09T01:29:17.227+10:002013-08-09T01:29:17.227+10:00Personally I'd be more inclined to cast at the...Personally I'd be more inclined to cast at the SQL level if you can't make JSTL behave sanely. Something like:<br /><br /> where ExampleId = ?::integer<br /><br />Craig Ringerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02343803844223399065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24384544.post-10117487828145607172010-12-30T03:19:40.828+11:002010-12-30T03:19:40.828+11:00Great, I was hitting my head with this problem whe...Great, I was hitting my head with this problem when I stumbled upon your answer. Thank you for the help!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com